|
Hello Reader, Does Western Wealth Impoverish Other Nations?Yet today, a stubborn narrative persists that economic prosperity is a zero-sum game: that Western prosperity causes Global South poverty. From academic “dependency theory” to progressive politicians lamenting historical American imperialism as a chief cause of poverty, this worldview paints poorer nations as helpless victims of rigged development and Western oppression. Botswana's Inspirational ExampleWhen Seretse Khama became Botswana's first president in 1966, his nation epitomized the dependency theorists' nightmare. The former British protectorate had no paved roads, virtually no industry, and a per capita income lower than Bangladesh. Colonial extraction had left the country desperately poor. Khama would have been justified to blame the West, but he never did. Why Nations FailNobel laureates Daron Acemoğlu and James Robinson's revolutionary research in "Why Nations Fail" explains why. Their evidence is overwhelming: North and South Korea share identical geography, culture, and history until 1945, yet North Koreans are among the world's poorest while South Koreans are among the richest. The Destruction of Dependency TheoryThe book destroys dependency theory by documenting a stunning "reversal of fortune": among European colonies, those that were more prosperous before colonization became relatively poorer afterward, while previously poor regions became wealthy. This pattern can't be explained by resources, geography, or ongoing Western policies—only by the institutional choices colonies made after independence. Trump's "Extractive" Foreign PolicyUnfortunately, Trump's transactional foreign policy validates zero-sum suspicions. His "America First" approach treats other nations as extraction opportunities rather than potential prosperity partners. The recent Congo deal—trading military support for mineral rights while ignoring the Democratic Republic of Congo's illiberal institutions—epitomizes extractive thinking. His escalating tariffs on India play directly into narratives about America preventing others' rise, when India's growth would benefit American consumers and workers. The Path ForwardAcemoğlu and Robinson bring us glorious news: any country can prosper by building democratic institutions that protect property rights, encourage entrepreneurship, and distribute political power. Any country that rejects “extractive” policies that favor elites can flourish. Refer a Friend:If you've enjoyed this episode of Dispatches from the Rebellion, please consider referring a friend. Forward this email and ask them to click on the "Subscribe" button below to sign up.
|
Editor of Dispatches from the Rebellion — a weekly newsletter covering freedom movements around the world. After 25 years in IT, I’ve dedicated my life to telling the stories of those risking everything for freedom. Each issue delivers sharp global updates, threats to American democracy, and profiles of the heroes fighting back. If you believe freedom is worth fighting for — you're in the right place.
Hello Reader, This week: the New York Times uses two words to shut down one of the most important conversations in America — and we reopen it. A hammer-and-sickle notebook in a Shanghai office, and the "No Kings" movement gets complicated. Thirty-six nations sign a statement — and do nothing. And the quote from Donald Trump that made Vladimir Putin's week. Dispatches from the Rebellion: Counterstrikes Edition Two Words. Debate Closed. No Kings. Just Commissars? The Land of Strongly Worded...
Hello Reader, Essay Last month, a single word published by the New York Times did an extraordinary amount of work. It settled beyond question — for you, for me, for everyone — one of the most profound questions of our time. "Falsely" I was digging deeper into claims that Nigerian Christians are being targeted and massacred by Muslim extremists. Sifting through research, I landed on a Times piece about Christian activists pressing the Trump administration on behalf of the victims. And there it...
Hello Reader, Freedom House released two reports last week: its annual global freedom rankings and its Q4 China Dissent Monitor. The headline on the first is grim — global freedom declined for the 20th consecutive year. The second captures something China's censors are working overtime to suppress. We cover both below.54 countries got worse. 35 improved. A major driver of the decline: Africa's accelerating coup belt — nine military takeovers since 2019, with two more last year. It's why two...