|
In 1952, President Harry Truman signed Executive Order 10340, seizing America's steel mills to prevent a nationwide strike during the Korean War. Within hours, federal officials marched into steel plants across the nation, posted government notices on factory gates, and informed startled executives they now worked for Washington. The National Security ThreatThe national security implications are catastrophic. These chips—while older models—will still power artificial intelligence systems that directly support the People's Liberation Army. Nvidia’s H20 chip capabilities will enhance China's military AI programs, helping them build smarter weapons and surveillance systems that oppress Chinese citizens and threaten our Southeast Asian allies. The Abandonment of Conservative PrinciplesThe administration claims this arrangement will generate $3 billion in revenue. But does anyone really believe federal bureaucrats will invest these dollars more productively than Nvidia and AMD would? These companies would channel the money into research laboratories, engineering talent, and next-generation innovations that secure America's technological edge. Instead, Trump wants to feed the same Washington spending machine that conservatives have battled for decades. American Prosperity: No Friends Left in DCHarry Truman seized steel mills only when national security demanded it. The Supreme Court rejected his power grab, understanding that even legitimate emergencies cannot justify trampling constitutional limits on government power. Refer a Friend:If you've enjoyed this episode of Dispatches from the Rebellion, please consider referring a friend. Forward this email and ask them to click on the "Subscribe" button below to sign up.
|
Editor of Dispatches from the Rebellion — a weekly newsletter covering freedom movements around the world. After 25 years in IT, I’ve dedicated my life to telling the stories of those risking everything for freedom. Each issue delivers sharp global updates, threats to American democracy, and profiles of the heroes fighting back. If you believe freedom is worth fighting for — you're in the right place.
Hello Reader, This week: the New York Times uses two words to shut down one of the most important conversations in America — and we reopen it. A hammer-and-sickle notebook in a Shanghai office, and the "No Kings" movement gets complicated. Thirty-six nations sign a statement — and do nothing. And the quote from Donald Trump that made Vladimir Putin's week. Dispatches from the Rebellion: Counterstrikes Edition Two Words. Debate Closed. No Kings. Just Commissars? The Land of Strongly Worded...
Hello Reader, Essay Last month, a single word published by the New York Times did an extraordinary amount of work. It settled beyond question — for you, for me, for everyone — one of the most profound questions of our time. "Falsely" I was digging deeper into claims that Nigerian Christians are being targeted and massacred by Muslim extremists. Sifting through research, I landed on a Times piece about Christian activists pressing the Trump administration on behalf of the victims. And there it...
Hello Reader, Freedom House released two reports last week: its annual global freedom rankings and its Q4 China Dissent Monitor. The headline on the first is grim — global freedom declined for the 20th consecutive year. The second captures something China's censors are working overtime to suppress. We cover both below.54 countries got worse. 35 improved. A major driver of the decline: Africa's accelerating coup belt — nine military takeovers since 2019, with two more last year. It's why two...