Trump Becomes America's Extortionist-In-Chief


In 1952, President Harry Truman signed Executive Order 10340, seizing America's steel mills to prevent a nationwide strike during the Korean War. Within hours, federal officials marched into steel plants across the nation, posted government notices on factory gates, and informed startled executives they now worked for Washington.
​
Two months later, the Supreme Court struck down Truman's power grab in a blistering 6-3 decision, ruling that even wartime emergencies cannot justify blatant overreach into private enterprise without congressional authorization.
​
But President Truman took this unprecedented step to defend national security interests during a time of war—when American soldiers needed steel for tanks and weapons to fight communism in Korea.
​
Today, President Trump endangers national security in peacetime while pursuing policies no less egregious.
​
Trump has engineered an unprecedented "pay-to-play" scheme that forces Nvidia and AMD to surrender 15% of their China revenues to the federal government in exchange for export licenses. This isn't governance—it's a protection racket with a presidential seal.
​
From tariffs that punish consumers to export taxes that handicap producers, Trump has proven himself an enemy of free enterprise and a barrier to economic growth—as his contempt for constitutional limits continues unabated. Article I, Section 9, Clause 5 of the Constitution states it clearly:
​
​"No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State."
​
​
Trump claims this extortion serves national interests, arguing that older chip models pose minimal security risks while generating federal revenue.
​
But Trump's own words reveal the transactional nature of his presidency: "I said if I'm going to do that I want you to pay us as a country something, because I'm giving you a release." This is how a mob boss talks, not the leader of the free world. The president has transformed the federal government into a competing business entity, treating private companies as rivals to be squeezed rather than engines of American prosperity to be unleashed.

The National Security Threat

The national security implications are catastrophic. These chips—while older models—will still power artificial intelligence systems that directly support the People's Liberation Army. Nvidia’s H20 chip capabilities will enhance China's military AI programs, helping them build smarter weapons and surveillance systems that oppress Chinese citizens and threaten our Southeast Asian allies.
​
Now Trump even hints at allowing sales of next-generation Nvidia Blackwell chips to China, funding our own strategic competitors while handing them a victory in the critical race for AI supremacy.
​
Liza Tobin, who served on the National Security Council during Trump's first administration, captured the absurdity perfectly: "What's next—letting Lockheed Martin sell F-35s to China for a 15 per cent commission?"
​
I support government intervention in private business when it threatens public harm or endangers national security. This situation clearly qualifies as the latter. But Trump's response represents the worst possible solution: creating financial incentives for Washington to overlook Chinese military applications while crippling American technological leadership.

The Abandonment of Conservative Principles

The administration claims this arrangement will generate $3 billion in revenue. But does anyone really believe federal bureaucrats will invest these dollars more productively than Nvidia and AMD would? These companies would channel the money into research laboratories, engineering talent, and next-generation innovations that secure America's technological edge. Instead, Trump wants to feed the same Washington spending machine that conservatives have battled for decades.
​
This represents the complete abandonment of conservative principles on multiple fronts. Free market economics? Destroyed by trade wars and crony capitalism. Constitutional governance? Trampled by executive overreach. National security hawkishness? Compromised by profit motives. Small government? Replaced by a regulatory regime creating new forms of taxation.
​
Trump's business background, once seen as an asset, has become a liability as he approaches the presidency like a corporate takeover artist. He views other successful businesses not as allies in American prosperity, but as competitors who must pay tribute. He applies leverage the same way he would pressure a business adversary.
​
The president even boasted about negotiating the 15% rate down from his initial 20, as if shaking down American companies deserves applause.
​
A few otherwise deferential Republicans are pushing back. Rep. John Moolenaar of Michigan, Chair of the House Select Committee on China, spoke bluntly: “Export controls are a frontline defense in protecting our national security, and we should not set a precedent that incentivizes the Government to grant licenses to sell China technology that will enhance its AI capabilities.”

American Prosperity: No Friends Left in DC

Harry Truman seized steel mills only when national security demanded it. The Supreme Court rejected his power grab, understanding that even legitimate emergencies cannot justify trampling constitutional limits on government power.
​
Trump has become what the founders feared most: a leader who uses government power not to protect the nation's interests, but to extract tribute from those who create its wealth.
​
And in abandoning the very conservative principles he claims to champion, Trump has left America without a major party that truly supports the private enterprises that have empowered our prosperity for 250 years.

Refer a Friend:

If you've enjoyed this episode of Dispatches from the Rebellion, please consider referring a friend. Forward this email and ask them to click on the "Subscribe" button below to sign up.

Eric Erdman

Editor of Dispatches from the Rebellion — a weekly newsletter covering freedom movements around the world. After 25 years in IT, I’ve dedicated my life to telling the stories of those risking everything for freedom. Each issue delivers sharp global updates, threats to American democracy, and profiles of the heroes fighting back. If you believe freedom is worth fighting for — you're in the right place.

Read more from Eric Erdman

The Global Fight for Freedom In 1997, President Clinton moved to open NATO's doors to Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic. George Kennan, the legendary Cold War diplomat who designed containment, called it a fateful error, warning of “the beginning of a new cold war." We in the West saw nations freed from Soviet rule choosing democracy. Moscow, broken and humiliated, saw the beginning of a siege against its faith, its traditions and its vital interests. Watching from inside the Kremlin was...

New here? You're reading Dispatches from the Rebellion — independent reporting on the global fight for freedom. Subscribe Free The Global Fight for Freedom "Substack and X (if you know where to look) are better sources for living-brain analysis of current events than much of the traditional press, where opinionating is performative and commercially formulaic. The reflexive need to strike pro- and anti-Trump notes often blots out everything that might be interesting to a curious and thinking...

The Global Fight for Freedom A banner unfurled at the World Cup ignites a firestorm, three words of compassion unleash the knives, and tyranny fills the void of an air base we abandoned. This week, three governments meet the consequences of their own retreats. Editor’s Note: This week’s episode marks a return to form. One long essay, then two short ones. The first is a slow read; the rest go quick and easy. Headlines The Empire Apologizing Itself Away The Nazis Banned Political Parties Too...